Repositioning Engaged Anthropology

Critical Reflexivity and Overcoming Dichotomies

Keywords: engaged anthropology, dichotomies, critical reflexivity, Switzerland

Abstract

This special issue aims to shed light on and recognize the full potential of engaged anthropology and its place in academia and beyond. It argues for an inclusive approach to be both theoretically enriching and methodologically grounded in diverse practices and forms. The introduction addresses common confusions and obstacles distracting engaged anthropology from its core premises and potentials. As the Interface Commission of the Swiss Anthropological Association (SEG), we seek to deepen the conversation about how engagement bolsters the discipline to stay relevant and robust, and embark on new paths of theoretical reflection. By “repositioning” engaged anthropology at the heart of contemporary anthropology, we seek to overcome unproductive dichotomies on engagements and practices by embracing critical reflexivity in the process of knowledge production and social action.

Author Biographies

Peter Larsen, University of Zurich, University of Geneva

Peter Bille Larsen is a senior lecturer and researcher at the Universities of Zurich and Geneva as well as visiting fellow at the College of Humanities, EPFL in Lausanne. His work addresses the governance intersection between heritage, sustainable development, and social equity issues at both local and global levels through both practice and research. Key publications include Post-frontier Resource Governance (Palgrave, 2015), The Anthropology of Conservation NGOs (Palgrave, 2018), World Heritage and Human Rights (Routledge, 2018), and World Heritage and Sustainable Development (Routledge, 2018) as well as recent publications on indigenous rights and environmental defenders. He engages extensively with NGOs, UN bodies, and international networks and is currently member of the Swiss Commission for UNESCO.

Doris Bacalzo, University of Lucerne

Doris Bacalzo is an associate researcher at the Department of Social and Cultural Anthropology, University of Lucerne. Her research focuses on the political economy of social relations and inequalities, and processes of social differentiation, marginalization, exclusion, and social transformation as they obtain in local settings and populations with entanglements with larger social and economic forces. She has extensive field research in Papua New Guinea, both for her PhD and post-doctoral studies, and in the Philippines for her MA, where she first gained critical insights on engaged anthropology, especially while doing research with groups of indigenous women and on issues of women’s reproductive health.

Patrick Naef, University of Geneva

Patrick Naef is a geographer and anthropologist at the University of Geneva. He works on violence and resilience; illegal governance; tourism and crime; collective memory and trauma. He is also collaborating with several community organizations active in cultural and urban development in Geneva and Medellin, Colombia.

Eda Elif Tibet, University of Bern

Eda Elif Tibet holds an SNSF funded PhD from the Institute of Social Anthropology, University of Bern. She is currently a postdoctoral researcher at the Institute of Geography (UniBern) working at the intersections of visual, multimodal anthropologies on mobility justice and the commons. She looks into the new sustainability narratives and regenerative practices through performance ethnographies. She is the co-founder of KarmaMotion, an award-winning documentary filmmaking collective. She is the visual anthropology lead at the Global Diversity Foundation where she works towards the documentation of the High Atlas cultural landscapes in Morocco and a core faculty at its Global Environments Network (GEN) where she mentors emerging environmental change makers throughout their GEN fellowship and actual summer academy taking place each year at the University of Oxford.

Leïla Baracchini

Leïla Baracchini holds a PhD in Social Anthropology and Art Theory from the University of Neuchâtel and the EHESS, Paris. Her researches focus on the politics of representation in a context of globalisation and on the processes of commodification of culture and identity. Her doctoral thesis was rewarded with the thesis prize of the Musée du quai Branly – Jacques Chirac 2019. Since 2010, she works in Southern Africa on the cultural transfers involved in the making of contemporary San art.

Susie Riva, Creighton University

Susie Riva received her doctorate in the Social Sciences from the University of Tilburg in conjunction with the Taos Institute after defending her thesis “Conflict Narratives: Mediation Case Studies in an Intercultural Context.” Her postdoctoral work in public health research focuses on mental health, immigrant health, and healthy aging within the Senior Living Lab. She uses autoethnography to generate transformative processes. She teaches mediation at the University of Geneva’s Valais Campus, social psychology at the Valais College for Alternative Medicine, and medical anthropology in the Department of Cultural and Social Studies at Creighton University in Omaha, Nebraska.

References

Abram, Simone, and Sarah Pink. 2015. “Introduction: Mediating publics and anthropology.” In Media, Anthropology and Public Engagement, edited by Sarah Pink and Simone Abram, 1–22. New York: Berghahn Books.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M., and Michael Holquist. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Becker, Howard. 1982. Art Worlds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Besteman, Catherine. 2013. “Three Reflections on Public Anthropology.” Anthropology Today 29, no. 6: 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12069
Besteman, Catherine, and Angelique Haugerud. 2013. “The Desire for Relevance.” Anthropology Today 29, no. 6: 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12068
Bringa, Tone, and Synnøve K. N. Bendixsen. 2016. “Introduction.” In Engaged Anthropology: Views from Scandinavia, edited by Tone Bringa and Synnøve K. N. Bendixsen, 1–22. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40484-4
Donskis, Leonidas, Ida Sabelis, Frans Kamsteeg, and Harry Wels. 2019. Academia in Crisis: The Rise and Risk of Neoliberal Education in Europe. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004402034
Eriksen, Thomas Hylland. 2006. Engaging Anthropology: The Case for a Public Presence. Oxford: Berg.
Escobar, Arturo. 1991. “Anthropology and the Development Encounter: The Making and Marketing of Development Anthropology.” American Ethnologist 18, no. 4: 658–682. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1991.18.4.02a00020
Freire, Paulo. 1994. Pedagogy of Hope, Reliving Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Translated by Robert R. Barr. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Hale, Charles. 2006. “Activist Research vs. Cultural Critique: Indigenous Land Rights and the Contradictions of Politically Engaged Anthropology.” Cultural Anthropology 21, no. 1: 96–120. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.2006.21.1.96
Hastrup, Kirsten, Peter Elsass, Ralph Grillo, Per Mathiesen, and Robert Paine. 1990. “Anthropological Advocacy: A Contradiction in Terms?” Current Anthropology 31, no. 3: 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1086/203842
Jeffery, Laura, Mariangela Palladino, Rebecca Rotter, and Agnes Woolley. 2019. “Creative Engagement with Migration.” Crossings: Journal of Migration and Culture 10, no. 1: 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1386/cjmc.10.1.3_1
Kirsch, Stuart. 2018. Engaged Anthropology. Politics Beyond the Text. Oakland, CA: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520297944.001.0001
Kirsch, Stuart. 2002. “Anthropology and Advocacy: A Case Study of the Campaign against the Ok Tedi Mine.” Critique of Anthropology 22, no. 2: 175–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/03075X02022002851
Kreps, Christina F. 2020. Museums and Anthropology in the Age of Engagement. New York; London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203702208
Larsen, Peter, Philippe Le Billon, Mary Menton, José Aylwin, Jörg Balsiger, David Boyd, Michel Forst, Fran Lambrick, Claudelice Santos, Hannah Storey, and Susan Wilding. 2020. “Understanding and Responding to the Environmental Human Rights Defenders Crisis: The Case for Conservation Action.” Conservation Letters 14, no. 3, e12777. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12777
Lassiter, Luke Eric. 2005. “Collaborative Ethnography and Public Anthropology.” Current Anthropology 46: 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1086/425658
Low, Setha M., and Sally Engle Merry. 2010. “Engaged Anthropology: Diversity and Dilemmas: An Introduction to Supplement 2.” Current Anthropology 51, no. S2: 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1086/653837
Lyon-Callo, Vincent, and Susan Brin Hyatt. 2003 “The Neoliberal State and the Depoliticization of Poverty: Activist Anthropology and ‘Ethnography from Below’.” Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development 32, no. 2: 175–204.
Martin, Kier, and Alex Flynn. 2015. “Anthropological Theory and Engagement: A Zero-sum Game?” Anthropology Today 31, no. 1: 12–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12153
Mignolo, Walter D., and Arturo Escobar, eds. 2010. Globalization and the Decolonial Option. London; New York: Routledge.
Nagengast, Carole, and Carlos G. Vélez-Ibañez. 2004. Human Rights: The Scholar as Activist. Oklahoma City, OK: Society for Applied Anthropology.
Podjed, Dan, Meta Gorup, Pavel Borecký, and Carla Guerrón Montero, eds. 2021. Why the World Needs Anthropologists. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003087397
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2018. The End of the Cognitive Empire: The Coming of Age of Epistemologies of the South. Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press.
Scheper-Hughes, Nancy. 2009. “Making Anthropology Public.” Anthropology Today 25, no. 4: 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8322.2009. 00674.x
Scheper-Hughes, Nancy. 1995. “The Primacy of the Ethical: Propositions for a Militant Anthropology.” Current Anthropology 36: 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1086/204378
Sillitoe, Paul. 2015. “The Dialogue between Indigenous Studies and Engaged Anthropology.” In Indigenous Studies and Engaged Anthropology. The Collaborative Moment, edited by Paul Sillitoe, 1–29. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315588377-1
Smith, L. Tuhiwai. 1999. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books.
Tibet, Eda Elif, and Abdi Deeq. 2018. “De Novo: Photography as a Way of Finding Place in the World, Presenting Abdi Deeq’s Art-Work. (Also in French: De Novo: “La photographie comme une façon de trouver sa place au sein du Monde”).” Jeunes et Mineurs en Mobilité 4: 18–35.
Tlostanova, Madina V., and Walter D. Mignolo. 2012. Learning to Unlearn: Decolonial Reflections from Eurasi and the Americas. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
Warren, Kay B. 2006. “Perils and Promises of Engaged Anthropology. Historical Transitions and Ethnographic Dilemmas.” In Engaged Observer: Anthropology, Advocacy, and Activism, edited by Victoria Sanford and Asale Angel-Ajani, 213–227. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Wilkinson, Iain, and Arthur Kleinman. 2016. A Passion for Society: How We Think About Human Suffering. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520287228.001.0001
Published
2022-04-05
How to Cite
Larsen, Peter, Doris Bacalzo, Patrick Naef, Eda Elif Tibet, Leïla Baracchini, and Susie Riva. 2022. “Repositioning Engaged Anthropology: Critical Reflexivity and Overcoming Dichotomies”. TSANTSA – Journal of the Swiss Anthropological Association 27 (April):4-15. https://doi.org/10.36950/tsantsa.2022.27.7994.