jsa

Special Issue

Vol. 30 No. 1 (2024): Forms of Autonomy. Assembly Practices and Collective Decisions on the Margin of the State

Emancipating from Autonomy : Ethnography of Deliberation Sessions on the Status of Indigenous Peasant Autonomy of Tarabuco (Bolivia, 2010–2023)

Submitted
April 8, 2023
Published
2024-11-17

Abstract

In 2010, following the approval of the constitutional right of Bolivia’s indigenous peoples and nations to political autonomy, the new Ministry of Autonomies is rushing to enforce it in various pilot indigenous municipalities. One of the candidates is the municipality of Tarabuco, renowned nationally and internationally for its material and ritual culture. An ethnography of the sessions of the assembly in charge of drafting a statute of autonomy, a local constitution to be recognized by the state in order to have access to the regime, shows the different perspectives of the process according to membership of local political institutions and organizations. After years of dispute, the organizations in place decided to abandon the process, which was deemed too dirigiste, leaving no room for in-depth debate on what becoming autonomous meant locally. The scuttling of the process was seen as a sovereign gesture in the face of attempts to impose a prefabricated autonomy system.

References

  1. Albó, Xavier. 2012. Tres municipios andinos camino de la autonomía indígena: Jesús de
  2. Machaca, Chayanta. Tarabuco, La Paz: CIPCA.
  3. Boccara, Guillaume. 2011. «Le gouvernement des ‘Autres’. Sur le multiculturalisme néolibéral en
  4. Amérique Latine.» Actuel Marx 2: 191-206. https://doi.org/10.3917/amx.050.0191.
  5. Boltanski, Luc, et Laurent Thévenot. 1991. De la justification. Les économies de la grandeur. Paris: Gallimard.
  6. Bayart, Jean François, et Jean Pierre Warnier. 2004. Matière à politique. Le pouvoir, les corps et les choses. Paris: Karthala.
  7. Fabricant, Nicole. 2010. «Between the Romance of Collectivism and the Reality of Individualism: Ayllus Rhetoric in Bolivia’s Landless Peasant Movement.» Latin American Perspectives 37 (4): 88-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X10373352.
  8. Foucault, Michel. 2004. Naissance de la biopolitique. Cours au Collège de France : 1978-1979. Paris: Seuil/Gallimard.
  9. Lascoumes, Pierre, et Patrick Le Gallès. 2005. Gouverner par les instruments. Paris: Presses de
  10. Sciences Po.
  11. Latour, Bruno. 2007. « Quel cosmos, quelles cosmopolitiques? Commentaire sur les conditions de la Paix selon Ulrich Beck.» In L’émergence des cosmopolitiques, édité par Jacques Lolive, Olivier Soubeyran, 69-84. Paris: La Découverte.
  12. Manin, Bernard. 1996. Principes du gouvernement représentatif. Paris: Flammarion «Champs».
  13. Murra, John. 1978. La organización económica del estado inca. Mexico City: Siglo XXI Editores.
  14. Platt, Tristan. 1984. «Liberalism and Ethnocide in the Southern Andes.» History Workshop 17: 3-18.
  15. Rousseau, Stéphanie, et Hernán Manrique. 2019. «La autonomía indígena ‹ tutelada› en Bolivia,» Bulletin de l’Institut français d’études andines, 1 avril 2019, 48 (1): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.4000/bifea.10314.
  16. Schavelzon, Salvador. 2010. «La Asamblea Constituyente de Bolivia: Etnografía del nacimiento de un
  17. Estado Plurinacional.» PhD diss, Museu Nacional Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janerio.
  18. Springerova, Pavlina, et Barbora Valiskova. 2017. «Formación de las autonomías indigenas
  19. originarias campesinas en Bolivia: Un proceso precario.» European Review of Latin American and
  20. Caribbean Studies / Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y del Caribe, 1 janvier 2017, 103: 109-130.
  21. Weismantel, Mary. 2006. «Ayllu: Real and Imagined Communities in the Andes.» In The Seductions of
  22. Community: Emancipations, Oppressions, Quandaries, édité par G. Creed, 77-100. Santa Fe: School of
  23. American Research.