Zur Hauptnavigation springen Zum Inhalt springen Zur Fußzeile springen

Laufende Forschung

Bd. 31 Nr. 1 (2025): Wechselseitige Verwundbarkeit: Privileg, Gewalt und Solidarität von der Feldforschung bis zur Wissenschaft

Migration, Representation, and Reflexivity.: An Intergenerational Dialogue on Current Issues

Eingereicht
December 18, 2024
Veröffentlicht
2025-11-13

Abstract

Contemporary anthropology increasingly confronts challenges of representation amid evolving cultural, social, and political landscapes. This special feature investigates how anthropologists engage in multimodal practices—from academic writing and digital media to performance and visualization—to convey research and negotiate power dynamics. It examines the transformation of field data into anthropological products, highlighting how politics, decoloniality, and ethical considerations shape representation. Through a two-part, student-led workshop, graduate students and practitioners explored alternative methods, employing self-reflection, performance, and creative visualization to address historical imbalances and misrepresentations. The resulting dialogue underscores the importance of reflexivity and engaged research practices that challenge traditional disciplinary boundaries. By integrating diverse perspectives and innovative techniques, the contributions call for a reimagined anthropology that embraces complexity and inclusivity while dismantling entrenched hierarchies. This feature ultimately advocates for a dynamic, performative approach to representing the “other” and rethinking scholarly practices. It offers a transformative roadmap for future anthropological inquiry with rigor.

Literaturhinweise

  1. Basu, Paul. 2017. “Communicating Anthropology. Writing, screening, and exhibiting culture.” In The Routledge Companion to Contemporary Anthropology, edited by Simon Coleman, Susan B. Hyatt, and Ann Kingsolver, 124–143. London: Routledge.
  2. Besteman, Catherine. 2013. “Three Reflections on Public Anthropology.” Anthropology Today 29 (6): 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12069.
  3. Fischer-Lichte, Erika. 2009. “Culture as performance.” Modern Austrian Literature 42 (3), Special Issue: Performance: 1–10
  4. Köhn, S. 2016. Mediating Mobility. Visual Anthropology in the Age of Migration. New York: Columbia University Press.
  5. Larsen, Peter Bille, Doris Bacalzo, Leïla Baraccini, Patrick Naef, Susie Riva, and Eda Elif Tibet. 2022. Repositioning Engaged Anthropology. Critical Reflexivity and Overcoming Dichotomies, Tsantsa / Swiss Journal of Sociocultural Anthropology 27: 4–15. https://doi.org/10.36950/tsantsa.2022.27.7994.
  6. Mingolo, Walter, and Rolando Vázquez. 2013. “Decolonial AestheSis: Colonial Wounds / Decolonial Healings.” Social Text Online, Periscope, July 15, 2013. https://socialtextjournal.org/periscope_article/ decolonial-aesthesis-colonial-woundsdecolonial-healings/.
  7. Schneider, Arndt. 2008. “Three Modes of Experimentation with Art and Ethnography.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S) 14 (1): 171–94.
  8. Tibet, Eda, E. 2022. “Learning to Be Freed. Affective Multimodalities in Third Space.” Tsantsa / Swiss Journal of Sociocultural Athropology 27: 58–77. https://doi.org/10.36950/tsantsa.2022.27.7788.
  9. Vargas-Cetina, Gabriela. 2017. “Representation, Politics of.” In The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, edited by H. Callan. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea2231.