sjsca

Special Issue

Vol. 31 No. 1 (2025): Reciprocal Vulnerability: Privilege, Violence, and Solidarity from Fieldwork to Academia

Rethinking the Role of Payments in Research: Reflections Towards a Collaborative Ethnographic Approach

Submitted
October 2, 2023
Published
2025-11-13

Abstract

Navigating payments in ethnographic research provides insights into social dynamics within ethnographic research contexts. Drawing from research with financially vulnerable queer male sex workers in Nairobi, Kenya, this article explores the meanings of money, privilege, and reciprocity within this specific socio-cultural setting. Reflecting on my position as a researcher from the Global North, it acknowledges privileges and addresses academic vulnerabilities resulting from unconventional research practices. By examining the roles of payments and reciprocity in research relationships, this article calls for reassessment of payment norms when engaging with economically marginalized communities. It highlights challenges in discussing these matters openly in academic circles and advocates for increased transparency and dialogue about financial aspects of fieldwork with interlocutors. The shift towards mutual collaboration outlined in this article fosters balanced reciprocity, ultimately facilitating the co-production of socially relevant anthropological knowledge aimed at promoting social justice and transformation for marginalized communities.

References

  1. Bungay, Vicky, Adrian Guta, Allie Slemon, Colleen Varcoe, and Scott Comber. 2022. “The Ethics of Financial Incentivization for Health Research Participation among Sex Workers in a Canadian Context.” Qualitative Health Research 32 (6): 942–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323221089877.
  2. Cajas, Juan, and Yolinliztli Perez. 2017. “Anthropologists, economic retribution and informants: Notes about ethics in social research.” Agathos 8 (1): 143–54.
  3. Chege, Njeri. 2017. “Towards a deeper understanding of the meaning of male beach worker-female tourist relationships on the Kenyan Coast.” Journal of Arts and Humanities 6 (2): 62–80.
  4. Cheng, Sealing. 2022. “Gold is Silence: On Money in Field Relationships.” In Silences, Neglected Feelings, and Blind-Spots in Research Practice, edited by Kathy Davis and Janice Irvine, 17–31. London: Routledge.
  5. Colvin, Christopher J. 2014. “Who Benefits from Research? Ethical Dilemmas in Compensation in Anthropology and Public Health.” In Ethical Quandaries in Social Research, edited by Deborah Posel and Fiona C. Ross, 57–74. Cape Town: HSRC Press.
  6. Cornish, Flora, Nancy Breton, Ulises Moreno-Tabarez, Jenna Delgado, Mohi Rua, Ama de-Graft Aikins, and Darrin Hodgetts. 2023. “Participatory action research.” Nature Reviews Methods Primers 3 (34). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-023-00214-1.
  7. Das, Veena., and Parry, J. 1983. “Fieldwork in South Asia.” Man 18 (4): 790–91. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2801912.
  8. Graeber, David. 2001. Toward an Anthropological Theory of Value: The False Coin of our Own Dreams. New York, US: Springer.
  9. Lücking, Mirjam. 2019. “Reciprocity in Research Relationships: Learning from Imbalances.” In Affective Dimensions of Fieldwork and Ethnography, edited by Thomas Stodulka, Samia Dinkelaker, und Ferdiansyah Thajib, 109–21. New York, US: Springer.
  10. Nagar, Richa, and Susan Geiger. 2007. “Reflexivity, Positionality and Identity in Feminist Fieldwork Revisited.” In Politics and Practice in Economic Geography, edited by Adam Tickell, Eric Sheppard, Jamie Peck, Trevor Barnes, Richa Nagar, and Susan Giger, 267–78. UK: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/ 9781446212240.n23.
  11. Pillow, Wanda. 2003. “Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodologi¬cal power in qualitative research.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 16 (2): 175–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000060635.
  12. Postill, John, and Sarah Pink. 2012. “Social Media Ethnography: The Digital Researcher in a Messy Web.” Media International Australia 145 (1): 123–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1214500114.
  13. De Regt, Marina. 2019. “‘In Friendship One Does Not Count Such Things’.” Etnofoor 31 (1): 99–112.
  14. Reed, Elizabeth, Kaveh Khoshnood, Kim M. Blankenship, and Celia B. Fisher. 2014. “Confiden¬tiality, privacy, and respect: Experiences of female sex workers participating in HIV research in Andhra Pradesh, India.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 9 (1): 19–28. https://doi.org/ 10.1525/jer.2014.9.1.19.
  15. Vanderstaay, Steven L. 2005. “One hundred dollars and a dead man: Ethical decision making in ethnographic fieldwork.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 34 (4): 371–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0891241605275478.
  16. Van Stapele, Naomi. 2019. “The quest for belonging among male sex workers and hustlers in Nairobi.” In Routledge Handbook of Queer African Studies, edited by S. N. Nyeck, 90–102. London: Routledge.
  17. Vacano, Mechthild von. 2019. “Reciprocity reconsidered: Toward a research ethic of economic participation.” In Affective Dimensions of Fieldwork and Ethnography, edited Thomas Stodulka, Samia Dinkelaker, Ferdiansyah Thajib, 123–34. New York, US: Springer.
  18. Woensdregt, Lise. 2024. “Making Noise: Sex Worker-led Organising and Knowledge Politics in Development Partnerships in Nairobi, Kenya.” PhD-Thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.5463/thesis.453.
  19. Woensdregt, Lise, Kibui Edwin Rwigi, and Naomi van Stapele. 2023. “Reflections on using a community-led research and action (CLRA) methodology to explore alternatives in international development.” In Reimagining Civil Society Collaborations in Development: Starting from the South, edited by Margit van Wessel, Tiina Kontinen, Justice Nyigmah Bawole, 41–53. London: Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781003241003-4.